-
Website
http://www.instigatorblog.com/ -
Original page
http://www.instigatorblog.com/technology-to-sales-the-evolution-of-a-software-startup/2008/05/06/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
AndyBeard
27 comments · 4 points
-
paulmcenany
8 comments · 1 points
-
webomatica
4 comments · 5 points
-
Michael Lankton
8 comments · 1 points
-
Joseph T. Dager
4 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Startup CEOs Make Millions of Decisions
2 days ago · 11 comments
-
Freedom
1 week ago · 14 comments
-
Indecision Kills Startups
1 week ago · 13 comments
-
Where’s the WOW! in Retail Stores?
3 weeks ago · 22 comments
-
Firing People Quickly is the Best Way
3 weeks ago · 18 comments
-
Startup CEOs Make Millions of Decisions
On the other hand, we've had to work hard at building the infrastructure, technology and client management processes that we had more or less taken for granted in previous employment.
I'd suggest that every startup needs to take a cold hard look at its core competencies, plan ahead and look to plug the gaps as soon as is practical.
Also, just to emphasise, I think the linked post "Launching a Startup is Barely Step One" (Instigator Blog, Feb 6th) is certainly worth a (re)read.
Our main business found a very unique niche and need for a software app for athletic directors at high schools. We knew we could sell it all day long (our organization was very heavily tilted towards marketing and sales.)
Well, basically, the exact opposite happened. We were selling and marketing like crazy, but never managed to get the "right" tech team in place.
Well, we eventually sold that business, and the new owner dusted-off the app and did it the right way.
It's amazing how sales and marketing get neglected, but I know from experience, the opposite can (and did) happen.
thanks,
Chris
(Banner Boy)
I think this is a very short-sighted statement. Any company that places more emphasis on one piece of the puzzle verses another, is compromising something. We see it all the time. there are companies that build killer technology, but don't flourish because they create no buzz or brand value because they don't value it nor think its a worthy investment. But the opposite is equally as true, and in fact I would argue probably more true - that there are just as many if not more companies that invest big dollars buzz-wow marketing with loaded promises, that simply don't deliver on the promise because they compromise the integrity of their product (and try to over-compensate with marketing).
I think neither factor is mutually exclusive. If you get into this business you just can't compromise anything. Both factors are critical to success and very interdependent.
I think this issue exists partially because our industry works within its own bubble. Successful non-tech businesses have been doing this for years, and its by no means a "new" issue for new companies. You have to value all factors of startup equally, and no one can trump another.
Too often I see these "loaded mantras" thrown around in this our industry as new insights or revelations into business entrepreneurship, and I think we need to take a larger view at the recipes for successful business outside the context of only this industry.
I like your blog, I'll be back!
The key to "doing it right" is to take a holistic approach from the beginning. Slow down your startup plans until you have actually considered every aspect of the business.
One "trick" I use with these companies is to grab an organizational chard from a major corporation, and show them what really happens in a company. A chart like that will show every aspect needed to build a strong company and not run away from yourself where you end up with either a product with no sales, or sales with no product.
Good post, Looking forward to reading more.
Great Blog.
@Banner Boy: Sure, the reverse of what I said can happen as well, but I did state specifically that I was talking about "software startups", which by definition (at least in my mind) means a company that starts with technology first. The reverse is possible of course - where the sales/marketing is strong, and product/tech is non-existence or weaker, but I'd say most startups in this day and age (in the tech sector) fall into the category I've defined.
And I'll stick by my statement, because a company focused solely on technology generally won't build up a critical mass of customers in order to succeed.
We certainly can look outside our industry and should, but I'm also targeting a specific audience with my content. I would never suggest that what I write is appropriate for a manufacturing startup, for example. And the fact is, many startups in "our world" are tech-heavy. It's all about "building a better mousetrap" instead of figuring out whether people really want a better mousetrap, and then how to sell and market it.
A special case I have seen is technically strong ISVs with little or no idea of sales and marketing. What made them special was a strong maintenance stream from their early adopters. The maintenance revenue allowed them to keep going without sales and marketing. This went on for decades, until, of course reality finally caught up with them. It came as a surprise to the managers of those companies, but not to anyone else…
I think you've hit the nail when you said "And, those strategies will impact product development. Just think about the viral components or features you might be able to build into your software application that could help with gaining traction…" When the company starts marketing and engaging its market, product development tends to become "market-driven" instead of the opposite approach of molding the market around your product. Thanks for this great article.
Thanks for all the comments!
I really wonder why so few technical guys know about this. They don't even try to educate themselves in that direction. Courses are available everywhere and You can buy a book about this in almost any bookstore. At least here in Hongkong, but that should be the same in any place.