<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Instigator Blog - Latest Comments in The Copycat Benefit for Startups</title><link>http://instigatorblog.disqus.com/</link><description>Focused on startups, entrepreneurship and social media</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:09:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Copycat Benefit for Startups</title><link>http://www.instigatorblog.com/the-copycat-benefit-for-startups/2008/07/07/#comment-1650096</link><description>I think the important thing to remember is that balance breeds the greatest success. So often, the 'first-movers' are focused on the product! They're so tuned into the product and breakthrough that they forget other, vital elements of running a business.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those who follow up take that initiative but because they're not 'all-product' they've got a broader view and an eye on the consumer market.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If someone with a unique idea kept a tap on every element of the business they'd have far more success.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rebecca Laffar-Smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:09:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Copycat Benefit for Startups</title><link>http://www.instigatorblog.com/the-copycat-benefit-for-startups/2008/07/07/#comment-1650102</link><description>In my opinion, the best product wins.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mehdi Akiki</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:52:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Copycat Benefit for Startups</title><link>http://www.instigatorblog.com/the-copycat-benefit-for-startups/2008/07/07/#comment-1650104</link><description>It's easy to copy the leader of a good innovation as it lowers your cost to break into a new market.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kris Washer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 01:07:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Copycat Benefit for Startups</title><link>http://www.instigatorblog.com/the-copycat-benefit-for-startups/2008/07/07/#comment-1650107</link><description>It's true that "copycats" have the great advantage of choosing better paths to success by avoiding those of "first-movers" that didn't work. It's hard for me to admit this, being in the process of creating a first-mover business, but I guess you have to face the reality in order to do a better job in sustaining a market leadership. It's also true that if you want to be successful in the long-term, you have to keep innovating. That's why I am always writing down new features to add to the business later on. Executing those new features will be another challenge, but that's what makes entrepreneurship so thrilling :-). Once again, great post, Tks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Loic</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:50:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Copycat Benefit for Startups</title><link>http://www.instigatorblog.com/the-copycat-benefit-for-startups/2008/07/07/#comment-1650106</link><description>Capitalism guarantees this kind of entrepreneurial exploitation.. though I confess you make a lot of points I hadn't considered regarding "copycats"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rich</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:02:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Copycat Benefit for Startups</title><link>http://www.instigatorblog.com/the-copycat-benefit-for-startups/2008/07/07/#comment-1650105</link><description>Hi Ben, you got your point.  Sometimes the followers can be more successful than the first movers.  However, not in every cases because there are most of the time the first movers never share their secrets.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Petitehye</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:39:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Copycat Benefit for Startups</title><link>http://www.instigatorblog.com/the-copycat-benefit-for-startups/2008/07/07/#comment-1650097</link><description>It's nice to have original ideas but copycatting is called  free enterprise.  Maybe it encourages good competition after all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bonnie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:30:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Copycat Benefit for Startups</title><link>http://www.instigatorblog.com/the-copycat-benefit-for-startups/2008/07/07/#comment-1650109</link><description>Ben,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your article last week on the "Big Bang" generated some great discussion, as this post will likely do, too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In order to have that "first mover" advantage, you need to really embody the “Ready-Fire-Aim” approach, as I described previously.  If an idea or product is so great, then somebody has got to go first, so why not me?  If you hit the market first, and then have to update/improve, that's OK.  That said, as I also described previously, you risk that consumers will tire of the boy who cried “Wolf!” too often, with all the iterative releases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for me?  I'd rather be "first-est with the most-est."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SalineVance</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:00:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Copycat Benefit for Startups</title><link>http://www.instigatorblog.com/the-copycat-benefit-for-startups/2008/07/07/#comment-1650108</link><description>There's sense in this. It boils down to whether a. There's a demand for the product b. Whether a fat profit can be made from it and c. Whether you can do it a lot better than the originator.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TigerTom</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:21:36 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>